Contents
Calendar
This Course
Home Page
About This Course
Course Outline
How It Works
Course Facilitators
Your Privacy
Contact Us
Your Account
Register
Login
Manage Account
About OpenID
Participating
Listen to Audio
Join a Backchannel Chat
Read Discussion Threads
Read Daily Newsletter
Newsletter Archives
Browse Blog Posts
Add a New Blog Feed
View List of Blogs
Live Meetings
Listen to Recordings
Web-based Activities
Feeds
Announcements RSS
Blog Posts RSS
OPML List of Feeds
Contents
Week 01 : Orientation
Week 02: Zoraini Wati Abas
Week 03: Martin Weller
Week 04: Allison Littlejohn
Week 05: David Wiley
Week 06: Tony Bates
Week 07: Rory McGreal
Week 08: Nancy White
Week 09: Dave Cormier
Week 10: Eric Duval
Week 11: Jon Dron
Week 12: Clark Aldrich
Week 13: Clark Quinn
Week 14: Jan Herrington
Week 15: Break
Week 16: Break
Week 17: Howard Rheingold
Week 18: Valerie Irvine and Jillianne Code
Week 19: Dave Snowden
Week 20: Richard DeMillo, Ashwim Ram, Preetha Ram, and Hua Ali
Week 21: Break
Week 22: Pierre Levy
Week 23: Tom Reeves
Week 24: Geetha Narayanan
Week 25: Stephen Downes
Week 27: Antonio Vantaggiato
Week 28: Tony Hirst
Week 29: Alec Couros
Week 30: Marti Cleveland-Innes
Week 31: Diana Laurillard
Week 32: George Siemens
Week 33: George Veletsianos
Week 34: Bonnie Stewart
Week 35: Terry Anderson
Reflections on the conversation...
Thanks to everyone who participated for these discussions. The conversation has taken the issues from the starting point I offered to address also the broader context of what it would mean for teaching to be practiced as a design science. Here is a precis of some of the points you made that I'll certainly build on in future:
1. The big problem is the lack of time provided for inservice in methods and practises related to computer based learning.
2. There needs to be a resource that informs us of the available resources and technologies we can use.
3. We need a 'rubbish mark' to help the 'crap detection' process as we search through the technology resources available for those that actually contribute to the learning process.
4. Pedagogical innovation should be open to everyone not just a select group of 'professional' educators.
5. We need a fundamental shift to see 'teacher-student' as a continuum or interchangeable role rather than a discrete category or otherness.
6. As for any design professional, the teacher plays many other roles as well - social worker and manager are among those.
7. Teaching as a design profession is not really about technology. It's about having a design mindset, a process or framework for designing an optimal learning environment and optimal learning products.
The idea of 'teaching being a design science' is too esoteric for many teachers. Teachers are seen, by the government, as deliverers of what the state decides they should deliver. So there is much to be said for promoting the idea of teaching as a design science. It would breathe new life and thought into what the profession entails. It would be looking at the profession through a different lens and would suggest personal teaching, just as we are currently encouraged to promote personal learning in students.
Thanks so much for your part in the conversation. Please follow up by email if you'd like to take it further. This is just the beginning, I hope!
Diana
[Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
