Contents
Calendar
This Course
Home Page
About This Course
Course Outline
How It Works
Course Facilitators
Your Privacy
Contact Us
Your Account
Register
Login
Manage Account
About OpenID
Participating
Listen to Audio
Join a Backchannel Chat
Read Discussion Threads
Read Daily Newsletter
Newsletter Archives
Browse Blog Posts
Add a New Blog Feed
View List of Blogs
Live Meetings
Listen to Recordings
Web-based Activities
Feeds
Announcements RSS
Blog Posts RSS
OPML List of Feeds
Contents
Week 01 : Orientation
Week 02: Zoraini Wati Abas
Week 03: Martin Weller
Week 04: Allison Littlejohn
Week 05: David Wiley
Week 06: Tony Bates
Week 07: Rory McGreal
Week 08: Nancy White
Week 09: Dave Cormier
Week 10: Eric Duval
Week 11: Jon Dron
Week 12: Clark Aldrich
Week 13: Clark Quinn
Week 14: Jan Herrington
Week 15: Break
Week 16: Break
Week 17: Howard Rheingold
Week 18: Valerie Irvine and Jillianne Code
Week 19: Dave Snowden
Week 20: Richard DeMillo, Ashwim Ram, Preetha Ram, and Hua Ali
Week 21: Break
Week 22: Pierre Levy
Week 23: Tom Reeves
Week 24: Geetha Narayanan
Week 25: Stephen Downes
Week 27: Antonio Vantaggiato
Week 28: Tony Hirst
Week 29: Alec Couros
Week 30: Marti Cleveland-Innes
Week 31: Diana Laurillard
Week 32: George Siemens
Week 33: George Veletsianos
Week 34: Bonnie Stewart
Week 35: Terry Anderson
Re: Digital support for teaching as a design science
That mirrors experiences I have had with students, where online peer evaluation and collaborative projects did take place - when I have tried similar in the calssroom the tendency is to talk about the weekend, or TV or something other - not through a tendency to distraction, but I suspect through a fear of being critical in a one to one space.
The asynchronous discussion spaces we have are on a VLE, but they are without doubt the best places to go to se the thoughts o students expanded and with illustarted examples (links, photographs and other digital artefacts) taht wouldn't (couldn't) happen in a session.
Given taht much of this is down to personal experiences and preferences, the challenge seems to be around the ways in which different approaches can be facilitated without excluding sections of the learning community. Many people don't use social media for instance, so by linking discussion through social media they become excluded.
I think one thing that seems to be significant too is the need for diffrent forms of creativity, the need for an online presence to match the presence that characterises face to face learning. Creating videos, images, podcasts and spaces that appeal is a set of learned skills that will need encouraging - all in all, its the transformation that seems so massive! Ideas are exciting, and the best teaching sitautions carry with them a sense of shared exploration and of excitement, a tangible sense of a journey. Making that happen online is clearly possible, it attracts such traffic and explosions of 'trending' topicality. what do we all have to teach each other to ensure that can identify this excitement as well as offering accountability and vision? The collaborative spaces presented offer some solution, though I can't help thinking that it is hard to fix any such space, and that they will arrive, prosper and subsequently dissolve organically.
Not wanting that to sound pessimistic, but it seems to be a character of the online space that 'here today, gone tomorrow' is part of a universal psyche - at least virtually.
Is the first chapter of the new book available on Change11 somewhere by the way? I'd like to read it [Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
