Contents
Calendar
This Course
Home Page
About This Course
Course Outline
How It Works
Course Facilitators
Your Privacy
Contact Us
Your Account
Register
Login
Manage Account
About OpenID
Participating
Listen to Audio
Join a Backchannel Chat
Read Discussion Threads
Read Daily Newsletter
Newsletter Archives
Browse Blog Posts
Add a New Blog Feed
View List of Blogs
Live Meetings
Listen to Recordings
Web-based Activities
Feeds
Announcements RSS
Blog Posts RSS
OPML List of Feeds
Contents
Week 01 : Orientation
Week 02: Zoraini Wati Abas
Week 03: Martin Weller
Week 04: Allison Littlejohn
Week 05: David Wiley
Week 06: Tony Bates
Week 07: Rory McGreal
Week 08: Nancy White
Week 09: Dave Cormier
Week 10: Eric Duval
Week 11: Jon Dron
Week 12: Clark Aldrich
Week 13: Clark Quinn
Week 14: Jan Herrington
Week 15: Break
Week 16: Break
Week 17: Howard Rheingold
Week 18: Valerie Irvine and Jillianne Code
Week 19: Dave Snowden
Week 20: Richard DeMillo, Ashwim Ram, Preetha Ram, and Hua Ali
Week 21: Break
Week 22: Pierre Levy
Week 23: Tom Reeves
Week 24: Geetha Narayanan
Week 25: Stephen Downes
Week 27: Antonio Vantaggiato
Week 28: Tony Hirst
Week 29: Alec Couros
Week 30: Marti Cleveland-Innes
Week 31: Diana Laurillard
Week 32: George Siemens
Week 33: George Veletsianos
Week 34: Bonnie Stewart
Week 35: Terry Anderson
Re: Digital support for teaching as a design science
Last catch-up point:
If teaching is a design science, what are the artefacts - good question:
"What are the artifacts created that can be evaluated? The digital lesson is one answer, but how are they evaluated?" - the lesson plan, or 'pedagogical pattern' designed in advance is one artefact, yes. It may or may not be digital, in the sense that it may be a conventional design, but it could still be expressed digitally. This is what we explored in the 'Learning Design Support Environment' project. I sent in the links last week, but I think this was another problem with my internet link as what is in the intro here is the first draft I sent in two weeks ago, and not the updated version. So I'll make that my next post.
Is it because they make meaning to the students? Is it because students can interpet better? - yes sort of, but the real value of the lesson design (or lab design, or fieldwork design, or homework design) is that it works for the students. So what is evaluated is the design in action - what happens in the classroom, or online, or at home. So all the aspects of the design process listed by brainysmurf apply.
So teaching is a design science in the sense that as teachers we design a plan with a rationale and expected outcome, then we test it out with students, see how it works or not, refine the design, and try again... and so on.
"Part of the profession is social worker and manager" - certainly, the teacher has many skills other than design, but that's true of an architect too, the equivalent being client relations and project manager, I guess, plus many other things. But ACKNOWLEDGE it as a design profession too - that's my plea - along with all that follows. Which brings us back to the first point raised in this discussion, that teachers need time for this. And politicians, school governors, quality inspectors, etc should acknowledge that if they want innovation from teachers. [Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
