Contents
Calendar
This Course
Home Page
About This Course
Course Outline
How It Works
Course Facilitators
Your Privacy
Contact Us
Your Account
Register
Login
Manage Account
About OpenID
Participating
Listen to Audio
Join a Backchannel Chat
Read Discussion Threads
Read Daily Newsletter
Newsletter Archives
Browse Blog Posts
Add a New Blog Feed
View List of Blogs
Live Meetings
Listen to Recordings
Web-based Activities
Feeds
Announcements RSS
Blog Posts RSS
OPML List of Feeds
Contents
Week 01 : Orientation
Week 02: Zoraini Wati Abas
Week 03: Martin Weller
Week 04: Allison Littlejohn
Week 05: David Wiley
Week 06: Tony Bates
Week 07: Rory McGreal
Week 08: Nancy White
Week 09: Dave Cormier
Week 10: Eric Duval
Week 11: Jon Dron
Week 12: Clark Aldrich
Week 13: Clark Quinn
Week 14: Jan Herrington
Week 15: Break
Week 16: Break
Week 17: Howard Rheingold
Week 18: Valerie Irvine and Jillianne Code
Week 19: Dave Snowden
Week 20: Richard DeMillo, Ashwim Ram, Preetha Ram, and Hua Ali
Week 21: Break
Week 22: Pierre Levy
Week 23: Tom Reeves
Week 24: Geetha Narayanan
Week 25: Stephen Downes
Week 27: Antonio Vantaggiato
Week 28: Tony Hirst
Week 29: Alec Couros
Week 30: Marti Cleveland-Innes
Week 31: Diana Laurillard
Week 32: George Siemens
Week 33: George Veletsianos
Week 34: Bonnie Stewart
Week 35: Terry Anderson
Re: Digital support for teaching as a design science
good point about the range of design required BrainySmurf, and alongside Loewenbl's comment about the additional roles - social worker...also motivational coach, mentor, support worker, accommodation advisor etc etc! I'm wondering, are the learning designers and the current in-house group the same people?
The teachers as resistance to change is regularly made, and in essence I see that if technology is going to be used more effectively it can't be at the expense of current teachers and in expectation of a whole new cohort - the ways that edeucators oppearting across different theoretical perspectives and with varied pedagogical approaches, have developed over years of perople's careers and incorporate their cahnging interests and expertise.
I don't think there is a single (or even easily identified multitude) of pedagogical approaches that sit nicely with each theory and that allow for a simple transference into technology based applications - a critical theory background utilising constructivist ideas - discussion, projects, and what have you is more than just a textbook response; it is a blend of a teacher's lived experiences and choices made from those experiences.
I was interested in the idea of an ontology for describing pedagogic patterns - not entirely sure how that would look, but it seems taht it would need to enegender as great a pattern of thought as does current practice in face to face encounters.
At times I feel like I am constantly caught between wanting to embrace technological approaches, and not being seen as someone that is trying to 'throw out the baby with the bath water'. Inpart, I think to do this requires an equally transformative position in how we see teaching and learning, who does it, in what ways and to what ends.
[Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
