Contents
Calendar
This Course
Home Page
About This Course
Course Outline
How It Works
Course Facilitators
Your Privacy
Contact Us
Your Account
Register
Login
Manage Account
About OpenID
Participating
Listen to Audio
Join a Backchannel Chat
Read Discussion Threads
Read Daily Newsletter
Newsletter Archives
Browse Blog Posts
Add a New Blog Feed
View List of Blogs
Live Meetings
Listen to Recordings
Web-based Activities
Feeds
Announcements RSS
Blog Posts RSS
OPML List of Feeds
Contents
Week 01 : Orientation
Week 02: Zoraini Wati Abas
Week 03: Martin Weller
Week 04: Allison Littlejohn
Week 05: David Wiley
Week 06: Tony Bates
Week 07: Rory McGreal
Week 08: Nancy White
Week 09: Dave Cormier
Week 10: Eric Duval
Week 11: Jon Dron
Week 12: Clark Aldrich
Week 13: Clark Quinn
Week 14: Jan Herrington
Week 15: Break
Week 16: Break
Week 17: Howard Rheingold
Week 18: Valerie Irvine and Jillianne Code
Week 19: Dave Snowden
Week 20: Richard DeMillo, Ashwim Ram, Preetha Ram, and Hua Ali
Week 21: Break
Week 22: Pierre Levy
Week 23: Tom Reeves
Week 24: Geetha Narayanan
Week 25: Stephen Downes
Week 27: Antonio Vantaggiato
Week 28: Tony Hirst
Week 29: Alec Couros
Week 30: Marti Cleveland-Innes
Week 31: Diana Laurillard
Week 32: George Siemens
Week 33: George Veletsianos
Week 34: Bonnie Stewart
Week 35: Terry Anderson
Re: Digital support for teaching as a design science
Two critical issues here:
"The main issue is the lack of time provided for inservice in methods and practises related to computer based learning."
- this is more important than any other, I think. Teachers' workload is so constrained by the external forces that drive what happens in a school, that they have no autonomy. Innovation is impossible without that. If they had a reasonable amount of protected time for their own development they could do so much with what is already around.
"There needs to be a resource that informs us of the available resources and technologies we can use."
- yes the good resources are not easy to find and it is easy to find rubbish. So with limited time available a teacher will be easily disillusioned. There has been talk in the UK over the years of 'kite-marking' or similar approaches, but I doubt we know enough to give an authoritative kite-marking that would be agreed by everyone. We could more easily give a 'rubbish-marking' I suspect! But borrowing models from other domains of user reviews, perhaps, could work. There are such resource sites, but they are not very well organised, and there is not much discipline about the peer review. This is where governments could do some useful organisation and leadership - far more use than interfering with pedagogy. [Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
