Contents
Calendar
This Course
Home Page
About This Course
Course Outline
How It Works
Course Facilitators
Your Privacy
Contact Us
Your Account
Register
Login
Manage Account
About OpenID
Participating
Listen to Audio
Join a Backchannel Chat
Read Discussion Threads
Read Daily Newsletter
Newsletter Archives
Browse Blog Posts
Add a New Blog Feed
View List of Blogs
Live Meetings
Listen to Recordings
Web-based Activities
Feeds
Announcements RSS
Blog Posts RSS
OPML List of Feeds
Contents
Week 01 : Orientation
Week 02: Zoraini Wati Abas
Week 03: Martin Weller
Week 04: Allison Littlejohn
Week 05: David Wiley
Week 06: Tony Bates
Week 07: Rory McGreal
Week 08: Nancy White
Week 09: Dave Cormier
Week 10: Eric Duval
Week 11: Jon Dron
Week 12: Clark Aldrich
Week 13: Clark Quinn
Week 14: Jan Herrington
Week 15: Break
Week 16: Break
Week 17: Howard Rheingold
Week 18: Valerie Irvine and Jillianne Code
Week 19: Dave Snowden
Week 20: Richard DeMillo, Ashwim Ram, Preetha Ram, and Hua Ali
Week 21: Break
Week 22: Pierre Levy
Week 23: Tom Reeves
Week 24: Geetha Narayanan
Week 25: Stephen Downes
Week 27: Antonio Vantaggiato
Week 28: Tony Hirst
Week 29: Alec Couros
Week 30: Marti Cleveland-Innes
Week 31: Diana Laurillard
Week 32: George Siemens
Week 33: George Veletsianos
Week 34: Bonnie Stewart
Week 35: Terry Anderson
Re: Digital support for teaching as a design science
Some interesting points made and the focus on the teacher remains a significant one. I liked the possibilities offered by collaborative spaces and shared developments. I was drawn to HowardJ's comments that refelect the changing in the fundamental patterns of how people learn that will perhaps replace the very fixed notions of teachers and studnets themselves. It is not mereley the pedagogoies that are not maximiing the affordances of the technologies, but the structures that delineate teachers FROM students. Shared spaces and collaborative design can be equally well done through the involvement of a range of individuals and groups and the need for an established teacher becomes diminished. The Freirean concept of teacher-student being a shifting intercahnge is possoble, and now more than ever necessary. I don't think this reduces the needs for discussion on pedagogical innovation, it just means that it is open to everyone not jsut a select group of professional 'educators.'
Our students have just completed projects where they selected something they wanted to share, to teach, and then selected technologies to do that with - they are not on a technology course - and the range of materials was fascinating, what they chose refelected largely how they seem themselves, and as HowardJ specifies, who they 'want to become'. Social media was popular, but for mature stuidenst the use of websites gave them opportunity to design something they had some fear of and wanted to conquer - become producers instead of always consumers. Progress seems to indicate that involvement is a nnecessary part of lkearning and as such the old distinction between teacher-student seems to be certain to dissolve, or at least radically transform.
Great to see you on here Professor Laurillard [Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
